Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - mineiro

Pages: [1]
General Discussion / Olavo de Carvalho
« on: April 20, 2017, 11:44:29 PM »
Hello sir Bogdan, I hope you're fine, well, a long time without post, I suppose that you're studying a lot.
I'm just posting this to tell you about sir "Olavo de Carvalho", he's a brazilian philosopher, writer and journalist, and years ago he was on your land, RomÍnia.
Maybe you can have interest on their publications, and you can also find their passage on your country too.
He's the type of guy that read 80 books per month, like a guru you know. He opened my eyes to many situations, including how the world is now.

Sol_Asm / writing to data or bss section variables
« on: July 26, 2016, 07:04:40 PM »
Hello sir Bogdan, I hope you're fine.
I'm being able to write on variables into data or bss section by using registers but not using direct value.
Code: [Select]
section "text" class_code alias ".text"
section "data" class_data alias ".data"
section "bss"  class_bss  alias ".bss"

.entry _start

test dq ?

tst dq 0

  mov [test], 0  ;<---
  mov [tst], 0   :<---

  mov rdi,0
  mov rax, 60
sol_asm2 mov0.solasm mov0.o -elf64
ld -m elf_x86_64 -o mov0 mov0.o
rm list.o
I'm able to 'xor eax,eax' or 'xor rax,rax' and after mov zeroed register to tst or test variable. But if I try direct number on that variables, on bss section solasm give me some errors while assembling and on data section assemble fine but when I execute program I'm receiving segmentation fault.

Sol_Asm / RIP addressing
« on: July 08, 2016, 02:25:57 PM »
This is my first post, I'm not a bot. My english language is poor, so be patience while reading, I'm learning english language alone on an autodidact way. I'm from Brazil.

Hello Sir Bogdan,
I have done some tests about rip relative address on linux x86-64, we have talked about this before, here are some outputs.
yasm and as assembler output this:
Code: [Select]
0000000000000000 <_start>:
   0:   8a 05 08 00 00 00       mov    al,BYTE PTR [rip+0x8]        # e <_start+0xe>
   6:   66 8b 05 00 00 00 00    mov    ax,WORD PTR [rip+0x0]        # d <_start+0xd>
   d:   8b 05 00 00 00 00       mov    eax,DWORD PTR [rip+0x0]        # 13 <_start+0x13>
  13:   48 8b 05 08 00 00 00    mov    rax,QWORD PTR [rip+0x8]        # 22 <_start+0x22>

solasm is generating this on first pass, and an error on second pass
Code: [Select]
0 0 0 0 00000000        .entry _start
0 0 0 0 00000000        _start:
0 0 0 0 00000000        mov al,byte [rip]               8A 05 FC FF FF FF
0 0 0 0 00000006        mov ax,word [rip]               66 8B 05 FC FF FF FF
0 0 0 0 0000000D        mov eax,dword [rip]             8B 05 FC FF FF FF
0 0 0 0 00000013        mov rax,qword [rip]             48 8B 05 FC FF FF FF
Appears that solasm uses signed instead of unsigned?

Thanks a lot sir.
ps: I have seen a minor mistake on manual regarding about structure ends, on STRUC ETH_PACKET structure that ends with ENS.

Pages: [1]